Executive summary
Home Up

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OF

THE STRATEGY AND

PROGRAM

 

“Si vis pacem, para pacem”

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

A Strategy for the Development

Of the University for Peace

 Executive Summary

 BACKGROUND

 1.   The University for Peace was established pursuant to a resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations in December 1980 to “provide humanity with an international institution of higher education for peace and with the aim of promoting among all human beings the spirit of understanding, tolerance and peaceful co-existence, to stimulate co-operation amongst people and to help lessen obstacles and threats to world peace and progress, in keeping with the noble aspirations proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations”.  It is headquartered at its campus of 302 hectares located on the outskirts of San José, Costa Rica.

 2.   The University for Peace (UPEACE) has a unique constitutional status within the United Nations family.  The Establishment of the University for Peace was approved by the General Assembly (A/RES/35/55) in conformity with an international agreement and its Charter.  The University however exists outside the normal framework of reporting and accountability  requirements which apply to most UN Organizations and Agencies.  This gives it an unusual degree of operating autonomy and flexibility under the guidance of its Council, and will enable the University for Peace to serve as an innovative link between the governmental and non-governmental constituencies in addressing peace and security related issues.

 3.      Although this autonomy and flexibility has been utilized thus far to only a limited extent, it will have much greater relevance and value in the period ahead in which new alliances and public-private partnerships will provide the most effective means of dealing with the complex issues that bear on peace and security.  Also, the University for Peace is a truly international University with the authority to grant degrees, which it does at the Master’s  and Doctor’s level.   

 4.   The University for Peace receives no financial support from the United Nations budget.  It must seek its financing entirely from voluntary contributions.  Since its inception, the University has received only limited funding from relatively few sources and its programs have necessarily been modest in scale and largely confined to Central and South America.  

 5.   Most of the programs and activities of the University have so far been carried out at its campus.  In addition there is the related World Research and Information Center for Peace, in Montevideo, Uruguay and, there are advisors in six other Central American countries, as well as in Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, Argentina, the Dominican Republic and Italy.  There has also been a European Center for the University for Peace in Belgrade.  All of these are being re-examined to determine how they can best contribute to the University’s new strategy and global mission.  

THE NEW COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION
6.   The governing body of the University for Peace consists of a Council composed of 15 Members appointed by the Secretary General of the United Nations, in consultation with the Director-General of UNESCO.  These include two nominees of the host country, Costa Rica and, as ex-officio Members, representatives of the United Nations, UNESCO and the UN University.

7.   In early 1999, as part of his continuing program of reform, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, with the support and advice of UNESCO Director-General Federico Mayor, and the encouragement and support of the Government of Costa Rica, took the necessary steps to reorganize, strengthen and more fully internationalize the University for Peace so as to enable it to contribute more effectively to the peace and security programs of the United Nations and the goals of its Charter.

8.   The Council was reconstituted with an entirely new membership and a list of the Members of the Council is attached as Annex A.  The first meeting of the new Council was held at UNESCO headquarters in Paris on March 29th and 30th, 1999.  Mr. Maurice F. Strong of Canada, a Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, was elected President of the Council.  The executive head of the University is the Rector, and Mr. Maurice Strong was appointed Rector by the Council on an interim basis pending recruitment of a new Rector.

9.   The second meeting of the new Council – the 11th Session of the Council of the University – was held in San José, Costa Rica, from November 21st to 23rd 1999.  The Council agreed on strategic and program guidelines which will launch a new era in the life of the University.  These are reflected more fully in the document prepared as a result of the decisions taken by the Council at the November 21-22, 1999 meeting, “A Strategy for the Development of the University for Peace.” This will provide the basis for consultations with potential partners and sources of funding and for the initiation of a number of projects designed to be valuable in their own right, while contributing to the further development of the Strategy and Program. 

 
VISION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

10. The Charter of the University mandates in broad but clear terms the activities to be carried out:  “The University shall contribute to the great universal task of educating for peace by engaging in teaching, research, post-graduate training and dissemination of knowledge, fundamental to the full development of the human person and societies through the interdisciplinary study of all matters relating to peace”. The new strategy is designed to build the capacity and program of UPEACE over a 5 year development period to the point where it will be in a position to be the focal point of a truly international program network, developed and implemented through close collaboration with many institutions and experts around the world, in particular within the United Nations system.  It will make full use of open-learning/distance-education techniques and technologies, in engaging and reaching people and partner institutions in other locations around the world.

11. In the field of education, UPEACE aspires to develop programs at both the Master’s and Doctor’s level in cooperation with other leading universities, in which course credits would be recognized by both parties, leading, in some cases, to granting joint degrees.  By the end of the five year development period it should be possible for students with the necessary undergraduate qualifications throughout the world to enroll in a UPEACE Program, to select from a range of course modules required to qualify for a degree and to take the courses at the campus of a partner University, at the UPEACE campus and through distance-learning.  A certain proportion of the courses would need to be taken on-campus, although the selection of the campus would be at the choice of the student.  A number of the course modules would also be accessed through virtual and distance-learning techniques.  In developing its courses, UPEACE would also plan to utilize the expertise of policy research institutes, academies of science and other institutions which have significant knowledge and capability in areas in which UPEACE decides to develop its courses but which do not normally carry out teaching programs of their own.  This would give the University an important additional source of intellectual input into its programs through an “institutional faculty”.

12. The research programs of UPEACE will also be carried out in cooperation with partner institutions in which both partners can make important value-added contributions.  Many established institutes have specialized capabilities and expertise which UPEACE does not have and need not duplicate whereas UPEACE can often provide a much broader reach and influence for the work of such partner institutions and add UN involvement and expertise which would not be so readily available to them

 13. In addition to its Degree and Research Programs, a special priority of UPEACE will be to foster and support citizen and community level programs and dialogue for the development of a Culture of Peace, for the prevention of conflicts and for their peaceful resolution.  It will make available the results of its research and academic work in the forms and  through the channels which will make them most relevant and useful to citizens and communities as well as to special constituencies of minorities, indigenous peoples, disenfranchised, elderly and disadvantaged people. 

 14. A particularly important constituency will be youth and the University will foster and support, in cooperation with UNESCO and leading youth organizations, the development of curricula and other materials for use in schools, and the dissemination of information and material for youth groups and other community organizations and special constituencies.  All of these would be designed to stimulate and support the development of a broad, people-based peace movement. 

 15. To guide the development of these activities, UPEACE plans to undertake an extensive review of existing peace education and research programs. Consultations, already in progress with leading institutions and experts, will assist in setting priorities and initiating programs as well as in identifying potential partners and sources of support.  UPEACE will also draw upon people of exceptional experience and standing in the fields of peace education, research policy and negotiations as distinguished faculty members, fellows, and experts to assist in developing and carrying out its academic and research programs.  These would also contribute to a roster of senior experts with experience which would be available to the United Nations, and particularly to the Secretary General, for peace-related assignments.

 

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

 16.  Three components of the UPEACE programme will be developed: 

 a)         the current activities will be reviewed, re-oriented and extended where appropriate; 

b)         several well-developed initiatives which have already been prepared and approved by the Council will be launched;

c)         new programme activities will be developed and launched on the basis of careful consultation and collaboration.

 

Main Themes 

 

17. Conflict prevention will be the principal guiding concept of the educational and research programs of UPEACE.  To achieve this, they will be organized around five themes:

 

-           Culture of Peace

-           Human Security

-           Governance, Democracy and Peace

-           Environment and Peace

-           Economics and Peace  

a)         Current Activities

 

18. The Culture of Peace and Consensus Building, Conflict Prevention and Resolution have been a key focus of the University’s current education and research program. Other important components are: a Doctor’s Degree Program in Communications and Peace, a Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Education for Peace, and reputable programs in the field of Natural Resources Management and Conflict Prevention.

19. In addition, UPEACE has an International Documentation and Information Center, (CEDIPAZ), and also the Gandhi Center for Communications and Peace, which operates as an audio-visual production unit.  Radio for Peace International, a separate, but closely related non-profit, short-wave radio station is located on the campus of UPEACE broadcasts peace-related programs throughout the world.  There is also the World Research and Information Center for Peace located in Montevideo, Uruguay.  Each of these is being evaluated to determine its role in the future of UPEACE. 

 b)         Developed Initiatives

 20. In addition to these ongoing activities, UPEACE is already taking three new initiatives:

 

a)      Peace Parks-  UPEACE has joined with IUCN (The World Conservation Union), the Peace Parks Foundation which is promoting and developing Peace Parks in Southern Africa, and other interested organizations, in exploring the prospects for cooperative development of a program designed to foster and support Peace Parks in trans-boundary and other sensitive areas in which they can contribute to peaceful cooperation in prevention of conflict as well as protecting the environment and natural resources of those areas.  

b)   The international “Ombudsman Center for the Environment and Development” (OCED)- UPEACE has agreed to cooperate with IUCN and the Earth Council in the development of an independent Ombudsman Center for the Environment and Development to assist in anticipating and avoiding environment and resource-related conflicts of an international nature and resolving them when they occur.  The Center will be located at the campus of UPEACE in San José and is expected to initiate it’s activities on a pilot basis during the year 2000.

c)   The development of Master’s degree programs in two fields: “Ecology and Peace -Managing Natural Resources Sustainably”, building on previous successful programs and “Tourism and Peace” with the emphasis on eco-tourism.

 c)         New Research and Education Activities

 21. Some promising opportunities have already been identified for the further extension of UPEACE programs on matters most directly relevant to the peace and security goals of the United Nations where the University can make a distinctive contribution.  But the launching of additional activities will be subject to very careful prior consultation and analysis, and in some cases pilot projects will be undertaken, before long term commitments are made. 

 22. During the initial preparatory year, studies will be carried out on a limited number of topics which will be selected selected from amongst those referred to below, based on the guidance of the UN Secretary General, wide consultations, the availability of appropriate partnership arrangements, and necessary funding.  It is not the intention to undertake all the proposed new activities: The programme of work will be built up gradually by initiating well-prepared activities as the human, financial and administrative resources become available.

 23. In all cases, decisions to undertake new programs, as well as the monitoring and evaluation of ongoing programs, will be guided by expert panels. The existing capacities of UPEACE, with its strategic partnerships with the Earth Council and IUCN, provide the basis for a comparative advantage in developing programs in the area of environment and peace in which there is a growing potential for conflict.  In developing and carrying out its programs in other theme areas, UPEACE will enter into cooperative arrangements with the most appropriate partner organizations.

 24. Part II of the document on “A Strategy for the Development of the University for Peace”(PD/1) presents the research and education strategy which UPEACE will follow and outlines all the programme activities – current activities, new initiatives and proposed new education and research activities.  For convenience and easy reference, these are listed below: 

 

AN OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES

      (a)              Current Activities at UPEACE

                        -           The Culture of Peace in Central America, education for conflict prevention.

                        -           Consensus Building and Conflict Resolution, training for leaders of civil society.

                        -           Communications and Peace, training of communicators.

                        -           Human Rights and Peace Education, training for educators in human rights.

                        -           Natural Resources Management and the Promotion of Peace, training specialists.

                        -           Conflict and Collaboration in Natural Resources Management, applying the

                        -           insights of research to the management and prevention of conflict.

                        -           The International Documentation and Information Center, CEDIPAZ.

 

      (b)              Activities Closely Related to UPEACE

                        -           The World Research and Information Center for Peace, Montevideo.

                        -           The Gandhi Center for Communications and Peace.

                        -           Radio for Peace International.

      (c)              New Activities

There are three types of new activity in preparation and development: Services to Society;  New Research and Education Activities;  and, Targeted Research on Key Policy Issues.

             1.         Services to Society

                         -           The international Ombudsman Center for the Environment and Development.

                        -           Peace Parks, a framework for certification and promotion of Peace Parks.

             2.         New Research and Education Activities, (preparatory studies and consultation.)

                         The Culture of Peace

                        -           The Media, Information Technology and Peace.

                        -           The Moral and Spiritual Foundations of Peace.

                        -           Human Rights and Peace.

                         Human Security

                        -           Migration, Refugees and Peace.

                        -           Threats to Civil Society, such as Terrorism and Organised Crime.

                        -           Women and Peace.

                        -           Youth and Peace.

                         Governance, Democracy and Peace

                        -           The Development of Effective Governance.

                        -           International Law.

                        -           The Military and Peace.

                         Environment and Peace

                         Economics and Peace

                        -           Economic Development and Peace

                        -           Business and Peace.

             3.         Targeted Research on Key Policy Issues

 In addition, research projects on a few selected issues will be undertaken during the development phase.  Some of the issues being considered are:

                   Global Issues

-          New Approaches to Major Threats to Peace, through nuclear disarmament, prevention of biological warfare and control of small arms etc.

-          The Role of the United Nations in Humanitarian Interventions.

 Regional Issues

-          Europe and North Africa:  The prospects for developing long term strategies and mechanisms to increase cooperation, relieve tensions and prevent conflicts between these two important and closely linked regions.

-          Ensuring Stability in Central Asia:  Analysis of prospects for the development of measures to promote economic recovery and cooperation within this turbulent but promising region.

-          The Role of Cuba in the Americas - Lessons to be learned from the unique and distinctive role that Cuba has played in the Americas.

-          The Development of Structures of Peace in Southern Africa- How to build on the remarkable success achieved to date in the transition to peace, democracy and sustainable development in Southern Africa.

 

WORK PLAN, FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

25. The most immediate priority of the new Administration of UPEACE, when it assumed its responsibilities in March 1999, was to put the house in order.  The unsatisfactory situation has now been rectified and the viability of UPEACE restored with the help of the United Nations Development Program, the Canadian International Development Agency and others.  However, the availability of finance remains the most important constraint on the ability of UPEACE to realize, develop and carry out its new Strategy and Program. 

26. The new Strategy and Program are designed to enable the University to achieve its objectives of becoming - over a five year period - a significant and effective center of a global network of peace education, research and related activities.  The initial three years will be particularly focused on program development, the first year being the preparatory phase.  In the final two years of the five year period the focus is expected to move more to implementation and strengthening the long term foundations for the continued evolution of the program. 

 27. During the preparatory year (2000) the current program will continue, under the direction of the Vice-Rector, with such improvements and modifications as may be desirable and feasible.  During this period, existing programs and activities located in other centers will be reviewed and evaluated as to whether and how they might best contribute to the new Strategy and Program.  Recruitment of new faculty and staff for these purposes will necessarily be limited because of the difficulty of offering adequate security of employment until sufficient finances are available.  Accordingly extensive use will be made of contract personnel and of part time faculty and experts, from whom candidates for longer term appointments will undoubtedly be identified.  Some important and immediate needs may be met through cooperation with and secondment from other organizations.

 28. In parallel with these continuing activities, a new Executive Director for Program Development, Mr. Martin Lees, has been appointed who will initially function from offices in Geneva as well as San José.  He will lead the process of Strategy and Program development, in close cooperation and inter-action with UPEACE existing program activities.  At the end of the preparatory year it is expected that the current and new activities will be integrated within a single program framework.

 29. This combination of current program and program development will require significant strengthening of management of the University, upgrading its physical plant, equipment and facilities at the San José campus and, especially important, upgrading the communications and computing and information processing capabilities of the University to provide it with the latest and best electronic  communications, computing, and distance-learning capabilities. 

  

FINANCING

 30   Financing is the most immediate and critical need if UPEACE is to be able to move ahead expeditiously with the realization of its proposed Strategy and Program while continuing its current activities.  A summary of the proposed budget for the revitalization of UPEACE together with projected financial requirements is available, (Document PD/3).  Of particular urgency and importance is funding for the first year preparatory phase which has already begun.  The minimum required for the core budget to proceed with the programme and development strategy as outlined above is approximately $US 4,126,000 including the support of ongoing programs.  An additional $US 4,150,000 would be required to proceed with the development of new programme activities and the revitalisation of UPEACE as outlined in the Strategy.  The optimum level for new programme development would be at the level of some $US 8,000,000. 

 31.  In order to ensure continuity in the development and implementation of the new Strategy and Program it will be essential have in place funding commitments which will expand over several years.  Initially however, potential supporters will undoubtedly not wish to make unconditional commitments of a long term nature.  Accordingly supporters are encouraged to make an initial commitment for the first preparatory year with an indication of potential future support which would depend on performance and progress during the preparatory phase.  Discussions on the particulars and modalities of such contributions will be undertaken on an individual basis with each prospective supporter.

 32. Initial consultations with potential partners, supporters and other interested parties have been extremely encouraging and helpful.  This has reinforced the conclusion of the UPEACE Council that its ambitious program of strengthening and revitalization of the University is achievable. 

 

 Members of the Council

 

Hon. Maurice Strong
President of the Council and Rector, 
UPEACE Executive Committee Member
Canada

 

H.E. (Ms.) Elizabeth Odio 
Vice President of Costa Rica
Vice President of the UPEACE Council  
 
Executive Committee Member  
Costa Rica

 

Professor Yuri Nikolaevich Afanasiev
Russian State University for Humanities
 
Russian Federation

 

Dr. (Ms.) Attiya Inayatullah   
International Planned Parenthood Federation, United Kingdom

Pakistan

 

Dr. Sverre Lodgaard 
 
Director, Norwegian Institute for International Relations
Norway

 

Professor Elikia M’Bokolo 
  
Centre d’Etudes Africaines, France
Congo

 

H.E. Ambassador Hisashi Owada 
 
President The Japan Institute of International Affairs
Japan

 

Dr. (Ms.) Anaisabel Prera Flores  
Special Adviser to Director General UNESCO, France
Guatemala

 

Dr. Steven C. Rockefeller
  
Chair, Rockefeller Brothers Fund
U.S.A.

 

Ambassador  Mohamed Sahnoun  
Special Adviser to Director General UNESCO, France
 
UPEACE Executive Committee Member

Algeria

 

Professor Rodolfo Stavenhagen
Centro de Estudios Sociológicos,  El Colegio de México
 
México

 

Ambassador Sonia Picado Sotela  
 
Member of the Legislative Assembly
Costa Rica

 

Mr. Nitin Desai   
United Nations Under Secretary General for Social and Economic Affairs, New York
UPEACE Executive Committee Member 

India

 

Professor Hans van Ginkel   
 
Rector, United Nations University, Japan
 
The Netherlands

 

Professor Dumitru Chitoran  
 
Representative of Director General UNESCO, France
UPEACE Executive Committee Member
Romania